Hillary’s Personality – Myers-Briggs INTJ & Enneagram Type One – Perfectionist

Part of my interest in Hillary Clinton and her campaign is due to the fact that we share the same basic personality types (Myers-Briggs INTJ & Enneagram Type One).  I feel I have a basic understanding of her basic character, qualities (positive and negative), and motivations, since I have student of these personality systems for the last several years.  It hurts to see her unfairly beat up by the press and individuals who I believe don’t really understand her.  Being an INTJ female is part of the problem for Hillary.  It’s rather uncommon for women to have this personality type – only 2 - 3% of females are INTJ.  INTJs are intuitive thinkers who have a tendency to value thinking and logic over emotion when making a decision (unlike most women).  As an intuitive thinker, Hillary more or less enjoys debating ideas and can argue both sides of an issue just for the hell of it!  (Hillary is clearly a stronger debater than Obama - an ENFP, for this reason).  Unfortunately, analytical thinkers like Hillary can come across as impersonal, overly analytical, rather blunt and outspoken (not particularily “lady-like” qualities).  Intuitive thinkers value being truthful over being tactful. (This has already been a problem for Hillary since being truthful won’t necessarily win you votes – people really don’t want to hear the truth.  If Obama’s growing popularity is any indication, Americans prefer “platitudes” and “feel good statements”.  But enough on Obama…that’s a future post).   INTJs are perfectionists which means they maintain high standards for themselves and others.   INTJs actually make natural leaders, however, being introverted, they generally don’t seek out the limelight.  When they do take on leadership positions, however, they often provide a new sense of purpose, vision or mission for an organization. 

Some other basis information about  INTJs – Hillary’s personality type:  Independent and individualistic.  Has great insight and vision.  Skilled in creating systems (do well as systems analysts, health care reformers?) , drives self and others toward goals and improvement, ingenious and creative problem solvers, organized, determined and good at follow-through, responsible, works in a logical and orderly way to develop innovative solutions to problems,reserved and private.

Read the following article, written by Michael Melcher, does a pretty good job of explaining why some people have difficulty understanding Hillary (and why they might enjoy calling her a “bitch” because she doesn’t follow the traditional female stereotype):   

Hillary Clinton: Misunderstood INTJ   (Original article at Michael Melcher’s blog at:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-melcher)

Melcher writes:  “Hillary Clinton is an introvert. I’m quite sure about this. My best guess is that, in Myers-Briggs terms, she is an INTJ (details below). This explains a lot about how the world regards her and why the press seems to find her so problematic.Let me start backwards. In yesterday’s New York Times, a lengthy article about Hillary Clinton’s political persona ends by comparing Hillary and Bill at the eulogy of one of Hillary’s best friends, Diane Blair. Hillary gave a great eulogy, but apparently it wasn’t tearful enough. “It was left to Bill Clinton to bring the service to its emotional peak,” the article concludes. “When he spoke of Mrs. Blair, Mr. Clinton wept. ‘I felt about her as I have rarely felt about anyone,’ he said. His wife, Diane Blair’s best friend, held steady in the front row.’” Presumably, what writer Mark Leibovich would like us to conclude is: “oooh, yet again Hillary is so cold and emotionally flat. Oooh, what a strange person she is.”What I concluded was, “yeah, big duh, Mark Leibovich. Hillary is an introverted thinker, and Bill is an extraverted feeler, and each was behaving in a style appropriate to his or her type.”According to the theory behind the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), each of us uses four different types of mental processes, each of which has two poles: introversion/extraversion, intuition/sensing, thinking/feeling and perceiving/judging. We have access to all of these functions, but we tend to prefer one of each pair. This theory is unprovable, but in my personal and work experience, it is valid. Introversion/extraversion refer to where people get their energy. Extraverts get their energy from other people, the external world, and experiences. Introverts get their energy from themselves or their own space. Extraverts are often chatty, social and open; introverts are often quiet, reflective and contained. Introverts open up to their close friends; extraverts open up to everyone. Bill Clinton is clearly an extravert; I think Hillary is an introvert. Since 75% of the population is extraverted, extraverts are considered normal. By comparison, introverts are considered a little weird (“why can’t you just open up?”). (As I’ve written in The Creative Lawyer, law is an exception: the majority of lawyers are introverts.) Introverts often have to feign extraversion to succeed in the professional world; their natural style is often not valued. Much of the criticism of Hillary Clinton’s authenticity is criticism of her introversion. She’s basically criticized for being private and for being careful about her words; and then she’s criticized for inauthenticity when she tries to act more extraverted and social. The second Myers-Briggs function is intuition vs. sensing. Intuitives look for concepts, the big picture, and possibilities. Sensing types are more interested in facts, details and concrete reality. Hillary has some strong sensing skills but my guess that she, like Bill, is an intuitive abbreviated as “N”).The third Myers-Briggs function is thinking vs. feelings. Both of these are ways of thinking. Thinkers prefer to make decisions based on impartial, objective principles, whereas feelers prefer to make decisions based on strongly held personal values or the effect on other people. Thinkers tend to think logically; feelers tend to think associatively. Though Hillary talks a lot about her values, I think that she, like the vast majority of lawyers and virtually all the men running for president (with the possible exception of John Edwards), is a thinker. Bill is a feeler.Around 60% of women are feelers, and around 60% of men are thinkers. This means that both Hillary and Bill are in the minority for their particular gender. This is where the press gets wigged out. The words commonly used to describe presidential presence are all thinker-ish: strong, clear-headed, tough, questioning, blah blah blah. So the press is constantly evaluating whether she’s enough of a thinker to be president. At the same time, the press seems discomfited that Hillary is not more girly: they also want her to be compassionate, open, nuanced — apparently she is supposed to cry at eulogies.The final Myers-Briggs polarity is judging/perceiving. This refers to attitudes about closure. People with a preference for judging like to be scheduled, organized, and know where they stand; people with a preference for perceiving are more spontaneous and open-ended. Hillary is a J, Bill is a big P.Conclusion: Hillary Clinton: INTJ. Bill Clinton: ENFP.What’s the point? Since Hillary is in the spotlight, more or less 24/7, people assume that everything she does has some core meaning that has implications for her potential presidency or her character. But sometimes Hillary is just being an introvert, and that’s that.”